Beyond Current AI Use: Perceived AI Automation Potential and Workers’ Expectations of Future Job Opportunities
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into workplaces has increased uncertainty about its implications for future employment. While existing research has examined workers’ current exposure to AI, less attention has been given to how workers perceive the extent to which their current job tasks could potentially be performed by AI. This study examines the relationships between current workplace AI exposure, perceived AI automation potential, and workers’ expectations regarding future job opportunities. Drawing on Cognitive Appraisal Theory, the study analyzes data from 3,975 employed respondents in the Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel Wave 157 (2024). Weighted multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine whether perceived AI automation potential provides incremental explanatory value for workers’ expectations beyond current workplace AI exposure. The findings indicate that perceived AI automation potential is strongly associated with expectations of fewer future job opportunities, even after controlling for current AI exposure, age, gender, education, income, and industry. Adjusted predictions further show that expectations of fewer opportunities increase from 28.8% among workers perceiving no automation potential to 58.3% among those perceiving that all their work could be performed by AI. The findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between what AI currently does and what workers believe AI could do in the future.
- Bankins, S., Jooss, S., Restubog, S. L. D., Marrone, M., Ocampo, A. C., & Shoss, M. K. (2024). Navigating career stages in the age of artificial intelligence: A systematic interdisciplinary review and agenda for future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 153, 104011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2024.104011
- Cao, J., Yao, J., & Zhang, F. (2025). Not all forms of artificial intelligence are perceived equal: AI functions and work outcomes. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(2), 100521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100521
- Gmyrek, P., Berg, J., Kamiński, K., Konopczyński, F., Ładna, A., Nafradi, B., Rosłaniec, K., & Troszyński, M. (2025a). Generative AI and jobs: A refined global index of occupational exposure (ILO Working Paper 140). International Labour Organization. https://doi.org/10.54394/HETP0387
- Gmyrek, P., Berg, J., Kamiński, K., Konopczyński, F., Ładna, A., Nafradi, B., Rosłaniec, K., & Troszyński, M. (2025b). Generative AI and jobs: A 2025 update. International Labour Organization. https://doi.org/10.54394/QFBQ1907
- Hyman, B. G., Lahey, B., Ni, K. X., & Pilossoph, L. (2025). How retrainable are AI-exposed workers? (NBER Working Paper No. 34174). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w34174
- Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company
- Lin, L., & Parker, K. (2025, February 25). AI and workers: Methodology. Pew Research Center.
- Lin, L., & Parker, K. (2025, February 25). U.S. workers are more worried than hopeful about future AI use in the workplace. Pew Research Center.
- Lin, L., & Parker, K. (2025, February 25). Workers' exposure to AI. Pew Research Center.
- Lin, L., & Parker, K. (2025, February 25). Workers' views of AI use in the workplace. Pew Research Center.
- Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage.
- Pew Research Center. (n.d.). 2024 Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel Wave 157 October 2024: Final topline. https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024/11/SR_24.11.19_dei-workplace_topline.pdf
- Pew Research Center. (n.d.). The American Trends Panel. https://www.pewresearch.org/the-american-trends-panel/.
- Savolainen, I., Ylinen, L., Grönroos, R., & Oksanen, A. (2026). AI transformation in working life: A systematic review of usage and attitudes towards AI among workers. Digital Business, 6(1), 100162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100162
- White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934
